Drawing for PERSON'S KIDS

USPTO serial 75578780

PERSON'S KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERSON'S KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Evening gowns, school uniforms, children's clothing namely, pants, jackets, trousers, overalls, sweaters, shirts and sport shirts, jackets, jogging pants, sweat pants, suits, skirts, trousers, formal wear, namely, tuxedos, overcoats, topcoats, raincoats, cardigans, sweaters, waistcoats, open-necked shirts, cuffs, sport shirts, blouses, polo shirts, shirts, nightgowns, negligees, pajamas, bath robes, camisoles, corsets, combinations, under shirts, chemise, long underwear, slips pants, brassieres, petticoats, swimsuits, bathing caps, Obi belts for Japanese style clothing, sash bustles for Obi, sash bustle clothing padding, waist clothing belts, underskirts, clothing sashes, clothing under-sashes, full size Kimono, Japanese half coats, braid for Japanese half coats, pleated skirt, replacement collars, aprons, clothing muffler, hosiery, shawls, scarves, Japanese socks, gloves, babies' cloth diapers, neckties, neckerchiefs, mufflers, ear muffs, hats and caps, garters, sock suspenders, braces in the nature of suspenders, belts for clothing, footwear, Japanese wooden clogs, Japanese slippers, baseball uniforms and socks, skj jackets, ski pants, wrist bands, golf shoes, soccer boots, ski boots, tennis shoes, mountaineering boots, basketball shoes, bowling shoes, baseball shoes, and rugby bootsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance