USPTO serial 75578829
OXYGON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OXYGON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
London, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. MURTAUGH
JOHN P MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hydrogen peroxide-based cleaners and institutional cleaners and stain removers for use on bathroom and kitchen hard surfaces and on fabric, carpet and fibrous materials, but not for use on automotive finishes | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants for household and institutional use, but not for use on automotive finishes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |