USPTO serial 75578830
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND J SLATTERY III
RAYMOND J SLATTERY III NORDSON CORP28601 CLEMENS RDWESTLAKE, OH 44145UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal nozzles for hot melt adhesive guns; metal nozzles for modules; and metal nozzles for dispensers, all used for dispensing hot melt adhesives | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |