USPTO serial 75578836
SMART MARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART MARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERRY K MUELLER JR
JERRY K MUELLER JR MUELLER & SMITH LPAMUELLER-SMITH BLDG7700 RIVERS EDGE DRCOLUMBUS, OH 43235-1355Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | INK CONTAINING DNA OR OTHER BIOLOGIC MARKER FOR PREVENTION OF COUNTERFEITING AND PRODUCT DIVERSION PERCEPTIBLE WITH INFRARED LIGHT; DNA IN THE FORM OF WRITING AND STAMP PAD INKS, AEROSOL SPRAY CONTAINERS, HOT FOIL PRINTING, AND PRINTING INK CONTAINING BIOLOGIC MARKERS TO PREVENT PRODUCT COUNTERFEITING AND PRODUCT DIVERSION; KITS COMPRISED OF STAMP PADS AND WRITING INSTRUMENTS FOR ENCODING OBJECTS WITH DNA OR OTHER BIOLOGICS AND HUMAN VISIBLE MARKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 023 | THREAD FOR TEXTILE USE ENCODED WITH DNA OR OTHER BIOLOGIC MARKER FOR PREVENTING PRODUCT COUNTERFEITING AND PRODUCT DIVERSION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SECURITY PRINTING, NAMELY, ENCODING DNA OR OTHER BIOLOGIC IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION ON VALUABLE DOCUMENTS AND OTHER OBJECTS FOR THE PREVENTION OF COUNTERFEITING AND PRODUCT DIVERSION; AND PROVIDING AN ONLINE DATABASE FOR THE REGISTRY OF OBJECTS ENCODED FOR CONFIRMING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE ENCODED OBJECTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DNA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DNA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMART MARK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |