Drawing for : INFLIGHT NEWSPAPERS & MAGAZINES

USPTO serial 75578888

: INFLIGHT NEWSPAPERS & MAGAZINES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with : INFLIGHT NEWSPAPERS & MAGAZINES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas S. Pulitzer

DOUGLAS S PULITZER THE PULITZER LAW FIRM22 FACTORY POND RDLOCUST VALLEY, NY 11560-1405UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FOR MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS, IN INTERNATIONALACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 22, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 22, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 17, 2002REINREINSTATED—
May 8, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 6, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 31, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 15, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance