USPTO serial 75578888
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas S. Pulitzer
DOUGLAS S PULITZER THE PULITZER LAW FIRM22 FACTORY POND RDLOCUST VALLEY, NY 11560-1405UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FOR MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS, IN INTERNATIONAL | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |