Drawing for EFFINITY

USPTO serial 75579048

EFFINITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFFINITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EVELYN A ASHLEY

AVELYN A ASHLEY RED HOT LAW GROUP OF ASHLEY LLC817 W PEACHTREE ST NW STE 400ATLANTA, GA 30308-1144UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software that will facilitate the establishing, managing, and scheduling of business communications and information, transfer, namely communications software for use in establishing connections between communications network users, database management software for managing business productivity and scheduling information, and software for use in managing business productivity and scheduling information and for collaborative document development and trackingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 31, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 13, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance