USPTO serial 75579612
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN MOISTURIZER, SKIN SOFTENING OILS AND LOTIONS, BODY MASSAGE OILS, BODY MASSAGE LOTIONS AND CREAMS, SKIN STRETCH MARK CREAMS, LOTIONS AND OILS, SKIN TEXTURIZER, SKIN CREAMS, SKIN CONDITIONER, SKIN SOOTHING GELS, SKIN CONDITIONERS, SKIN CREAM, SKIN LOTION, SKIN SOFTENER LOTION AND OIL PREPARATIONS, SKIN SMOOTHING PREPARATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |