USPTO serial 75579681
DIGITAL IMMUNE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL IMMUNE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BETH M GOLDMAN
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Computer hardware installation and maintenance services | ACTIVE | May 11, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |