Drawing for RICHARD SIMMONS' DREAM MAKER

USPTO serial 75579947

RICHARD SIMMONS' DREAM MAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICHARD SIMMONS' DREAM MAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY MERCALDI

ANTHONY MERCALDI BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP124000 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF A TELEVISION SERIES FEATURING THE FULFILLMENT OF THE NEEDS, WANTS AND DESIRE OF PEOPLE; PRODUCTION OF FAMILY-ORIENTED TELEVISION PROGRAMSACTIVEFeb 2, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 24, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 21, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 20, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 8, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 2, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 29, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance