USPTO serial 75579947
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY MERCALDI
ANTHONY MERCALDI BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP124000 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF A TELEVISION SERIES FEATURING THE FULFILLMENT OF THE NEEDS, WANTS AND DESIRE OF PEOPLE; PRODUCTION OF FAMILY-ORIENTED TELEVISION PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 24, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |