USPTO serial 75580045
BARKER SAWRIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BARKER SAWRIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THE BARKER GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 1Z5, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE BARKER GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANGELO NOTARO
ANGELO NOTARO NOTARO & MICHALOS, PCEMPIRE STATE BLDG350 FIFTH AVE STE 6902NEW YORK, NY 10118-0110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Dimension quality control system comprised of sensors, sensor controller, computer hardware and computer software for monitoring, trending and recording sawing patterns, for use in sawmills to continuously monitor the thickness and quality of boards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |