USPTO serial 75580064
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ENGINEERING SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Frederick, MD
Other trademarks owned by ENGINEERING SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.
ENGINEERING SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Frederick, MD
Other trademarks owned by ENGINEERING SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.
ENGINEERING SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Frederick, MD
Other trademarks owned by ENGINEERING SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANINE S BENTON
Janine S Benton Benton Potter & Murdock, PC400 South Maple AvenueSuite 210Falls Church, VA 22046| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING FOR FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THEIR PRIME CONTRACTOR AGENTS, AND FOR MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE MANUFACTURING, ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES, EXCLUDING THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY, IN THE FIELDS OF WAR MODELING, BUSINESS PROCESS SCENARIOS, SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND DATA PROCESS AND ACTIVITY MODELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |