Drawing for LONE WOLF

USPTO serial 75580253

LONE WOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LONE WOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren Krupka

Lauren Krupka Aristocrat Technologies, Inc7230 Amigo StreetLegal DeptLas Vegas, NV 89119

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MACHINES FOR PLAYING GAMES OF CHANCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 22, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2001OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 14, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 19991.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 4, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance