USPTO serial 75580283
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan A. LaVine Flaster/Greenberg, PC1628 John F. Kennedy Blvd., 15th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | forecasting of computer and telecommunication network capacity; specialized computer and telecommunications network initiatives, namely, customized telecommunications services implemented using Advanced Intelligent Network call routing technology; telecommunications switching ; local number portability | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | consultation in the field of provisioning computer and telecommunications network services, namely, consultation regarding the design, engineering, specification, installation, testing, activation and technical support of computer and telecommunication hardware, software and networks; Measurement of computer and telecommunication network capacity; consultation in the field of computer and telecommunication network surveillance; alarm monitoring | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |