USPTO serial 75580451
Serial No. 75580451
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3098418Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75580451?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Han Xuan Canada Development Limited
Ontario L4S IG4, CA
Other trademarks owned by Han Xuan Canada Development Limited
Han Xuan Canada Development Limited
Ontario L4S IG4, CA
Other trademarks owned by Han Xuan Canada Development Limited
Kwun Tong, Kowloon, HK
KWUN TONG, KOWLOON, HK
XIAN ZONG LIN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
KOWLOON, HK
Other trademarks owned by XIAN ZONG LIN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
XIAN ZONG LIN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
KOWLOON, HK
Other trademarks owned by XIAN ZONG LIN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Beth Ciocco
Mary Beth Ciocco Mary Beth Ciocco, LLCPO Box 937Columbia Station, OH 44028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 4, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Han Xuan Canada Development Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Han Xuan Canada Development Limited
- Other trademarks owned by RBT International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by RBT ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by XIAN ZONG LIN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by XIAN ZONG LIN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |