USPTO serial 75580709
DPOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3245699Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2007
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DPOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cindy L. Caditz
Cindy L. Caditz DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL CAMERAS, PRINTERS FOR RECORDING DIGITAL IMAGES ON UNEXPOSED PHOTOGRAPHIC PAPER AND OTHER RECORDING PAPER; PHOTOFINISHING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, PHOTOFINISHING MACHINES FOR DEVELOPING, FIXING, WASHING, DRYING, PRINTING AND SELECTIVELY ENLARGING PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING, SCANNING, DISPLAYING, ANALYZING, EDITING, PROCESSING, RECORDING, TRANSMITTING AND PRINTING DIGITAL IMAGES FOR USE IN THE [ FILED ] * FIELD * OF PHOTOFINISHING AND VIDEO IMAGE PROCESSING; VIDEO CAMERAS; VIDEO IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, NAMELY, MULTI-FUNCTION VIDEO IMAGE PROCESSING MACHINES FOR CREATING, SCANNING, DISPLAYING, ANALYZING, EDITING, PROCESSING, RECORDING AND TRANSMITTING AND PRINTING DIGITAL VIDEO IMAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |