USPTO serial 75580782
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FOREST HILLS, NY
FOREST HILLS, NY
FOREST HILLS, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIANNE ABELMAN
JULIANNE ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PARENTALLY SUPERVISED ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES FOR BABIES AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, INTERACTIVE PLAY CENTERS IN RETAIL STORE SETTINGS, EXCLUDING VACATION RESORT FACILITIES, FOR SHORT TERM ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FEATURING MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT AND MUSIC INSTRUCTION, SPORTS AND GAMES, INSTRUCTION IN SIGN LANGUAGE, COOKING, SINGING, DANCING, GYMNASTICS, ART AND SPORTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |