Drawing for SPORTING GOODS OUTLOOK

USPTO serial 75581588

SPORTING GOODS OUTLOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORTING GOODS OUTLOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Jordan

LYNN M JORDAN FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consultation services, namely providing advice relating to consumer shopping trends for sporting goods, market developments in sporting goods and merchandising and retail advice relating to sporting goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Sep 28, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance