USPTO serial 75581795
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LAGUNA HILLS, CA
LAGUNA HILLS, CA
LAGUNA HILLS, CA
Laguna Hills, CA
LEWISVILLE, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA SHEREEN ZAMALUDIN
Kay Lyn Schwartz Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600IP SECTIONDallas, TX 75201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely a machine for use in microdermabrasion procedures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |