USPTO serial 75581800
BIOEFFECTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2929055Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2005
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOEFFECTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melbourne, AU
Melbourne VICTORIA, AU
Melbourne VICTORIA, AU
Melbourne, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, namely, skin soaps, liquid soaps for the skin, face, hands and body, and shower gels for the body, bath and feet; perfumes and colognes and eau de toilette; essential oils intended for personal use and for use in the manufacture of scented products; cosmetics, namely, face toners, cleansers, scrubs and masks; face creams, lotions and gels; body lotions, creams and gels; hand and nail creams, lotions and gels; body deodorants and personal deodorants; bath and personal wash; foot baths salves, lotions, creams and powders; lipsticks, lip pencils, lip liners, lip gloss; mascara; eye liner and eye pencil; eye shadow and eye shadow pencil; eyebrow pencils; blushes; foundation make up and concealers; face powders; hair lotions for use as shampoos and conditioners; mouthwashes and toothpastes; breath fresheners, mouthwashes and toothpastes; laundry detergents in liquid and powder form containing disinfectant; and dishwashing liquid containing disinfectants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 23, 2000 |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment and prevention of - colds and flu; sore throats; tonsillitis; anaemia; leucopoenia; tinea; thrush; colpitis, sinusitis; burns; wounds; eczema, endocrine disorders, and immunological disorders, namely, rheumatoid arthritis and immuno-deficiency resulting from organ transplants, radiotherapy and chemotherpy and viral infections; oral hygiene preparations for use in the treatment of - gingivitis; periodontitis; caries; gelatine plates for bleeding and receding gums; bad breath/halitosis; medicated mouthwashes; medical toothpastes; medicated plaque removers, namely anti-plaque mouth rinses and oral plaque removal preparations; medicated lozenges; medicated chewing gums with anti viral and anti bacterial properties; dietetic substances adapted for medicinal use, namely, dietary supplements in the form of - diet pills; nutritional supplements; metabolic enhancers, meal replacement drinks; meal replacement bars; multivitamin tonics; wound dressings, surgical dressings, and burn dressings; disinfectants, namely all purpose disinfectants, hospital grade disinfectants, and disinfectants for contact lenses; fungicides and herbicides for domestic and agricultural use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 23, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOLAGRAN LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Solagran Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Solagran Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Solagran Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named BIOEFFECTIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |