USPTO serial 75581807
GLORY DAY "THE MYSTERY OF THE SAGRADA FAMILIA"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLORY DAY "THE MYSTERY OF THE SAGRADA FAMILIA"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANSELM BOSS
9663 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 806BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production and distribution of motion picture films, rental of cinema films, rental of audio cassettes, rental of video cassettes, rental of videotape cassettes, production of cinema films, multi media software production services, audiotape production, videotape production, record production | ACTIVE | Nov 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARTINEZ, ANTONIO MECA
- Other trademarks owned by MARTINEZ, ANTONIO MECA
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GLORY DAY "THE MYSTERY OF THE SAGRADA FAMILIA"
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |