USPTO serial 75581978
HIGH VELOCITY CVD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH VELOCITY CVD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Jaffer
DAVID H JAFFER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP2550 HANOVER STPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Semiconductor manufacturing equipment, namely chemical vapor deposition processing chambers, ultra high vacuum pumps and wafer-handling cluster tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |