Drawing for THIOKOL PROPULSION

USPTO serial 75582008

THIOKOL PROPULSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THIOKOL PROPULSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TISH L. BERARD

CHRISTOPHER L HOLT INTERNATIONAL CENTRE - #1600WESTMAN CHAMPLIN AND KELLY PA900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007HOUSE MARK FOR A FULL LINE OF ROCKET MOTORS FOR SPACE, DEFENSE AND COMMERCIAL LAUNCH APPLICATIONSACTIVE—
012HOUSE MARK FOR A FULL LINE OF SPACE VEHICLES, NAMELY, ROCKETS FOR SPACE, DEFENSE AND COMMERCIAL LAUNCH APPLICATIONSACTIVE—
040HOUSE MARK FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF GENERAL PRODUCT LINES IN THE FIELD OF ROCKETS TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERSACTIVE—
042HOUSE MARK FOR THE DESIGN OF GENERAL PRODUCT LINES IN THE FIELD OF ROCKETS TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 9, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 2, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 3, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance