USPTO serial 75582269
PORTRAIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORTRAIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
INIANAPOLIS, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Durlacher
JAMES M DURLACHER BANK 1 CTR TWRWOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET AL111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | flat screen television receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMASON MULTIMEDIA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PORTRAIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |