USPTO serial 75582326
NETDISPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETDISPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward W. Goodman
EDWARD W GOODMANPHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORP580 WHITE PLAINS RDTARRYTOWN, NY 10591Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO DISPLAYS CONNECTED TO ONE OR MORE SERVERS THROUGH A DIGITAL NETWORK, ALLOWING USERS TO INTERACT WITH APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE EXECUTED ON A SERVER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |