USPTO serial 75582414
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NAOMI S RHODES
STEPHEN W FEINGOLD ESQ PITNEY, HARDIN, KIPP & SZUCH LLP685 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | DOMESTIC SEWING MACHINES, INDUSTRIAL SEWING MACHINES, HAND-KNITTING MACHINES, METAL WORKING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; ELECTRONIC STAMP-CREATING MACHINES, NAMELY, A MACHINE WHICH CREATES PRE-INKED STAMPS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | WORD PROCESSORS; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER PRINTERS; FACSIMILES; AND COMPONENT AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | indicator lights; work lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND MANUAL TYPEWRITERS; ELECTRONIC AND MANUAL LABEL PRINTING MACHINES; COMPUTER PRINTING INK RIBBONS; RUBBER STAMPS; THERMOPLASTIC FILM STAMPS; AND ATTACHMENTS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |