Drawing for WE'RE AT YOUR SIDE

USPTO serial 75582414

WE'RE AT YOUR SIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE'RE AT YOUR SIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NAOMI S RHODES

STEPHEN W FEINGOLD ESQ PITNEY, HARDIN, KIPP & SZUCH LLP685 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007DOMESTIC SEWING MACHINES, INDUSTRIAL SEWING MACHINES, HAND-KNITTING MACHINES, METAL WORKING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; ELECTRONIC STAMP-CREATING MACHINES, NAMELY, A MACHINE WHICH CREATES PRE-INKED STAMPS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFORACTIVE—
009WORD PROCESSORS; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER PRINTERS; FACSIMILES; AND COMPONENT AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFORACTIVE—
011indicator lights; work lightsACTIVE—
016ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND MANUAL TYPEWRITERS; ELECTRONIC AND MANUAL LABEL PRINTING MACHINES; COMPUTER PRINTING INK RIBBONS; RUBBER STAMPS; THERMOPLASTIC FILM STAMPS; AND ATTACHMENTS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFORACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Dec 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance