Drawing for KAN JANG KOLD KARE

USPTO serial 75582585

KAN JANG KOLD KARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOONEYHAM, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAN JANG KOLD KARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD N. ARONSON

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005herbal supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 3, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance