USPTO serial 75582807
QED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
QED Intellectual Property Limited
Hayes, Middlesex, UB3 1HH, GB
QED Intellectual Property Limited
Hayes, Middlesex, UB3 1HH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
JAMES A OLIFF ALEXANDRIAOLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLCP O BOX 19928, VA 22320Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the intellectual property rights of others, namely, assessing the commercial potential of intellectual property rights, managing the marketing of intellectual property rights, and monitoring royalty payments made in connection with the transfer or licensing of intellectual property; business investigations including due diligence searching, commercial investigations, company searches and market research; intellectual property portfolio management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Professional advice and consultations in the field of intellectual property, including the establishment, filing prosecution, maintenance and enforcement of intellectual property rights; patent agency, patent attorney services and trademark agency services; computer services relating to intellectual property rights, namely the searching of company, marketing, trademark and patent databases via computer terminals; language translation and interpretation services; legal services; research and consultation services, all relating to legal, patent and trademark services; licensing of intellectual property, including auditing license agreements and negotiating license agreements; and advisory services all relating to exploitation and licensing of intellectual property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QED Intellectual Property Limited
- Other trademarks owned by QED Intellectual Property Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QED
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |