USPTO serial 75582815
ATECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Dougherty
DAVID E DOUGHERTY DOUGHERTY & TROXELL5205 LEESBURG PIKESTE 1404FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041-3401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS, ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL CURRENT RECTIFIERS, ELECTRICAL RELAYS, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS, UNINTERRUPTED SUPPLIES (UPS); TELEPHONES, TELEPHONE SWITCHING EQUIPMENT FOR DIRECT INWARD SYSTEMS ACCESS, NAMELY, PRIVATE BRAND EXCHANGES (PABX'S) THAT REQUIRE ONLY ONE TRUNK AND THAT PROVIDE A VERBAL MENU AUTOMATIC PROCESSING OF CALLS; RADIO PAGERS; INVERTERS | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |