USPTO serial 75582836
PROCALCIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOONEYHAM, JANICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROCALCIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Mangelson
MICHAEL E MANGELSON STOEL RIVES LLP201 S MAIN ST STE 1100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-4904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | on pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of hypercalcaemic-related diseases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |