USPTO serial 75582909
VIDEO DOORBELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEO DOORBELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Anaheim Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L. Chapin
WILLIAM L CHAPIN16791 SEA WITCH LNHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | REMOTE VIDEO MONITORING STATION AND BASE RECEIVING STATION APPARATUS COMPRISING VIDEO CAMERA, MICROPHONE AND TRANSMITTER FOR TRANSMITTING VIDEO AND AUDIO SIGNALS BETWEEN BASE STATION AND REMOTE STATION, RECEIVER FOR RECEIVING AUDIO SIGNALS AND VIDEO SIGNALS FROM REMOTE STATION OR BASE STATION, LOUDSPEAKER AND TELEVISION MONITOR FOR CONVERTING RECEIVED SIGNALS TO AUDIBLE AND VISUAL SIGNALS, REMOTE STATION POWER SUPPLY INCLUDING BATTERY TRICKLE CHARGER POWERED BY DOORBELL TRANSFORMER CURRENT, REMOTE HAND-HELD CONTROL FOR CONTROLLING OPERATION OF VIDEO DOORBELL BASE STATION AND REMOTE STATION, TELEPHONE RECEIVING STATION FOR INTERFACING BASE STATION WITH TELEPHONE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |