USPTO serial 75583104
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SUNNYVALE, CA
Mountain View, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Mountain View, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanda L. Neundorf
Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq. Fenwick & West LLPSilicon Valley Center801 California StreetMountain View, CA 94041| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | photographic and video cameras | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |