Drawing for SYMBIO LACT

USPTO serial 75583411

SYMBIO LACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYMBIO LACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H HOLT

WILLIAM H HOLT LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM H HOLT1423 POWHATAN ST #2ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL AND VETERINARY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BIOLOGICAL CULTURES AND MEDIA FOR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES FOR MEDICAL, FOR VETERINARY AND FOR SANITARY PURPOSES AND FOR THE CARE OF HEALTH, SUCH NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES CONSISTING OF OR CONTAINS BACTERIAL AND/OR ENZYME PREPARATIONS; VITAMIN PREPARATIONS, ROUGHAGE AND MINERAL-FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; NAMELY, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMINS, MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS AND NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES FRO ANIMAL AND HUMAN FOOD; PREPARATIONS OF TRACE ELEMENTS FOR HUMAN AND ANIMAL USE, NAMELY, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND /OR TRACE ELEMENTS FOR MEDICAL, FOR VETERINARY, FOR SANITARY PURPOSES AND FOR TH CARE OF THE HEALTHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 9, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 9, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 20, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 15, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance