USPTO serial 75583411
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H HOLT
WILLIAM H HOLT LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM H HOLT1423 POWHATAN ST #2ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL AND VETERINARY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BIOLOGICAL CULTURES AND MEDIA FOR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES FOR MEDICAL, FOR VETERINARY AND FOR SANITARY PURPOSES AND FOR THE CARE OF HEALTH, SUCH NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES CONSISTING OF OR CONTAINS BACTERIAL AND/OR ENZYME PREPARATIONS; VITAMIN PREPARATIONS, ROUGHAGE AND MINERAL-FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; NAMELY, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMINS, MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS AND NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES FRO ANIMAL AND HUMAN FOOD; PREPARATIONS OF TRACE ELEMENTS FOR HUMAN AND ANIMAL USE, NAMELY, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND /OR TRACE ELEMENTS FOR MEDICAL, FOR VETERINARY, FOR SANITARY PURPOSES AND FOR TH CARE OF THE HEALTH | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |