USPTO serial 75583512
SCANZ SCANNOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2900041Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2004
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCANZ SCANNOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BINGHAM B LEVERICH
BINGHAM B LEVERICH COVINGTON & BURLINGP O BOX 7566WASHINGTON, DC 20044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HAND-HELD INSTANT REPLAY VIEWING DEVICE THAT STORES AND PLAYS BACK AUDIO AND VIDEO DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 8, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCANZ COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SCANZ COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SCANZ COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SCANZ COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SCANZ SCANNOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |