USPTO serial 75583644
RUNWAY TO REALWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUNWAY TO REALWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry S. Agdern
BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST CORPORATION959 EIGHTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's clothing, namely, pants, hats, blouses, sweaters, skirts, dresses, coats, suits, jackets, lingerie, shoes, athletic footwear, boots, hosiery, bathing suits, beach robes, bathrobes, pajamas, nightgowns, athletic wear, namely, tops and bottoms, body suits, tank tops, t-shirts, jumpers, leggings, biking shorts, leotards, overalls, boxer shorts, exercise suits, sweat tops, sweat bottoms, golf shirts, golf pants, golf shoes, golf socks, tennis wear, warm-up suits, sweat bands; socks, and belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |