USPTO serial 75583934
FOU FOU VALENTINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTERS, SHANNA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOU FOU VALENTINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl S. Sawyer, Jr.
Karl S. Sawyer, Jr. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP100 North Tryon StreetBank of America Corporate Ctr., 42nd Fl.Charlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, ladies' and children's clothing, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, blouses, skirts, dresses, jackets, coats, socks, underwear, hats, caps, gloves, shoes, belts, scarves, neckties, and handkerchiefs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FOU FOU VALENTINE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |