USPTO serial 75583942
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlene D. Hanks
ARLENE D HANKS MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC2200 W MAIN ST STE 800DURHAM, NC 27705UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for managing clinical trial data and information in the field of pharmaceutical, veterinary, pharmacogenomic, biotechnical and medical products and devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized database management and data processing services in the fields of pharmaceutical, veterinary, pharmacogenomic, biotechnical and medical products and devices; manufacturers' sales representatives in the field of pharmaceutical, veterinary, pharmacogenomic, biotechnical and medical products and devices; business marketing consultation services in the fields of pharmaceutical, veterinary, pharmacogenomic, biotechnical and medical products and devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Clinical research and testing services in the fields of pharmaceutical, veterinary, pharmacogenomic, biotechnical and medial products and devices; consultation services in the fields of pharmaceutical, veterinary, pharmacogenomic, biotechnical and medical products and devices; healthcare policy research and development services for others; laboratory testing services in the fields of pharmaceutical, veterinary, pharmacogenomic, biotechnical and medical products and devices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |