Drawing for SENBA

USPTO serial 75584336

SENBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caroline H. Mead

CAROLINE H MEAD SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLPONE MARITIME PLZ STE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002COLORANTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOODACTIVE—
029SOUPS, AND SEAFOOD AND VEGETABLE EXTRACTSACTIVE—
030LIQUID AND POWDER CARAMEL, FOOD FLAVORINGS, FOOD SEASONINGS, TEA AND SAUCESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 9, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 8, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 9, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 8, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 22, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance