Drawing for SECURITY.TV

USPTO serial 75584716

SECURITY.TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECURITY.TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Durlacher

JAMES M DURLACHER WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON,111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Television receivers used in home security systemsACTIVE—
042Home security services, namely monitoring and controlling home security systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 11, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 22, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 2, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 25, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 15, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance