USPTO serial 75584717
POSTRUNNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, STACEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSTRUNNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Durlacher
JAMES M DURLACHER BANK ONE CTR TWRWOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON ET AL111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | television receivers incorporating circuitry to receive data services in the fields of information, education and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computerized on-line ordering services in the fields of electronics products, apparel, automobile parts, food, furniture, jewelry, sporting goods, and appliances | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | on-line bill payment services; on-line banking transaction services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic mail services; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named POSTRUNNER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |