Drawing for WIRELESS EXPRESS PAYMENT SERVICE

USPTO serial 75584765

WIRELESS EXPRESS PAYMENT SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIRELESS EXPRESS PAYMENT SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Krebs

ROBERT E KREBS BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Payment verification systems, namely, communications devices and payment terminalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 5, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 5, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 18, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 9, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance