USPTO serial 75584820
GRACE ROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRACE ROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hamilton HM 12, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Gilbert Ricciuti
3735 CONCORD RDDOYLESTOWN, PA 18901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee and coffee extracts; coffee substitutes and extracts of coffee substitutes; tea and tea extracts; cocoa and preparations having a base of cocoa; chocolate, confectionary, sweets; sugar; bakery products, pastry, desserts, puddings; ice cream, products for the preparation of ice cream; honey and honey substitutes; rice and cereals, foodstuffs having a base of rice or other cereals; flour; cornmeal; aromatizing or seasoning products for food; mayonnaise; condiments, namely prepared sauces, brown sauces, pepper sauces, hot sauces, fruit sauces, chutney and ketchup | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic drinks, carbonated beverages, non- carbonated malt beverages, syrups, extracts and essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |