USPTO serial 75585085
AVOID THE SUGAR HIGHS AND CRASHING LOWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOONEYHAM, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVOID THE SUGAR HIGHS AND CRASHING LOWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Stephenson
PATRICK C STEPHENSON MCGRATH NORTH MULLIN & KRATZ PC LLOSTE 3700 FIRST NATIONAL TWR1601 DODGE STOMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Meal replacement drinks and meal replacement powders | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Dairy-based food beverages, vegetable based food beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Grain-based food beverages, ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars and ready-to-eat sports food bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit-based food beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named AVOID THE SUGAR HIGHS AND CRASHING LOWS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |