USPTO serial 75585255
1 & 1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1 & 1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TOP STAR DISTRIBTION GROUP INC.
RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed great northern beans, processed mung beans, processed garbanzo beans, processed red lentils, processed green lentils, processed black eye beans, processed yellow split peas, quince preserve, rose petal jam, sour cherry preserve, carrot preserve, fig preserve, 3 fruit jam, cucumbers pickled, shallots pickled, mixed vegetables pickled, egg plants pickled, pomegranate paste, tamarind paste, sabzi ghomah, (dehydrated dried vegetables),sabi polo (dehydrated dried vegetables), sabzi kookoo (dehydrated dried vegetables), sabzi aash (dehydrated dried vegetables); noodle veggie soup, barley and 7 spice soup, and golden prunes; sour cherry dried; processed mulberries, processed barberry | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 1993 |
| 030 | Barley, soft wheat kernel, dry vermicelli, roasted vermicelli, turmeric, spice for rice, BBQ powder, black pepper, white pepper, cardamom green, cayenne pepper, cloves, coriander, curry powder, fish powder, garlic granulated, marjoram ground, kabob seasoning, saffron; black caraway seed, shallots, and barberry for use as seasonings; sour cherry syrup, quince syrup, orange blossom syrup, rose syrup, lemon syrup, pomegranate molasses, grape molasses, date molasses; seasonings, namely, dillweed, fenugreek, savory leaves, mint cut, cilantro leaves, basil leaves, leeks, spinach flakes and tarragon leaves; wheat flour, rice flour, chick pea flour, baking powder, pure honey, pure honey comb, pure light honey, white basmati rice and Thai jasmine rice | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 1993 |
| 032 | Rose water, mint water, willow water, tarooneh water, Kashni water, shahtareh water, sour grape juice, pomegranate juice, lime juice, lemon juice, mango juice, tamarind juice and apricot juice | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |