Drawing for T TRANSGUIDE TECHNOLOGY IN MOTION

USPTO serial 75585375

T TRANSGUIDE TECHNOLOGY IN MOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T TRANSGUIDE TECHNOLOGY IN MOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER D SOLDANO

JENNIFER D SOLDANO TEXAS DEPT OF TRANSPORTATIONDEWITT C GREET STATE HWY BLDG125 E 11TH STAUSTIN, TX 78701-2483

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009A computerized traffic safety system including a high-speed data analysis computer network for monitoring traffic conditions, controlling traffic signals, and managing emergency service response, road construction and maintenance, and special events; an electronic sensor system, including surveillance cameras for transmitting traffic condition information; and traffic control equipment, including changeable message signs and lane control signalsACTIVEJul 26, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance