USPTO serial 75585377
IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew T. Hoyne
ANDREW T HOYNE ARMSTRONG, TEASDALE, SCHLAFLY & DAVISONE METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for managing sales and customer information in the chemical distribution and manufacturing industry, and manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |