USPTO serial 75585930
LORNA OPPENHEIMER'S TRADE SECRETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 26, 2000
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LORNA OPPENHEIMER'S TRADE SECRETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | INTERIOR DECORATION AND DESIGN CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES REGARDING LORNA OPPENHEIMER'S RECIPE AND METHOD EXCLUSIVELY FOR CONSUMERS; WORKSHOPS AND LECTURES REGARDING LORNA OPPENHEIMER'S RECIPE AND METHOD FOR INTERIOR DESIGN AND HOME DECORATING EXCLUSIVELY FOR CONSUMERS; TELEPHONE HOTLINE COUNSELING, NAMELY, OFFERING ADVICE REGARDING INTERIOR DESIGN AND HOME DECORATING REGARDING LORNA OPPENHEIMER'S RECIPE AND METHOD EXCLUSIVELY FOR CONSUMERS; AND INFORMATION, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE INFORMATION EXCLUSIVELY FOR CONSUMERS REGARDING LORNA OPPENHEIMER'S RECIPE AND METHOD CONCERNING HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGS, INTERIOR DESIGN AND HOME DECORATING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OPPENHEIMER, LORNA
- Other trademarks owned by OPPENHEIMER, LORNA
- Other trademarks owned by OPPENHEIMER, LORNA
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LORNA OPPENHEIMER'S TRADE SECRETS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |