Drawing for THE POWER OF COMPETITIVE CHOICE

USPTO serial 75586029

THE POWER OF COMPETITIVE CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE POWER OF COMPETITIVE CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L. KIMPORT

DAVID L KIMPORT NOSSAMAN, GUTHNER, KNOX & ELLIOTT, LLP50 CALIFORNIA ST34TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039FORMING, OPERATING AND FINANCING OF UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, AND THE PROCURING AND REBUNDLING OF COMPETITIVE UTILITY SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance