USPTO serial 75586107
VIADOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2456637Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2001
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIADOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADAM C. STRIEGEL
ADAM C STRIEGEL BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWR1 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1420Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACCESSING, CONNECTING, DEVELOPING AND MANAGING COMPUTER DATABASES OF BUSINESS INFORMATION OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, ACROSS NETWORKS AND WITHIN A NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 1999 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SEMINARS AND TRAINING SESSIONS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACCESSING, CONNECTING, DEVELOPING AND MANAGING BUSINESS INFORMATION OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND ACROSS NETWORKS AND WITHIN A NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 1999 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE AND EMAIL; MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CUSTOM COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE RELATED TO COMPUTER SYSTEM DESIGN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infospace, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VIADOR INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIADOR INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIADOR INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIADOR, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIADOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |