USPTO serial 75586109
CLUB MONACO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLUB MONACO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5V 1L5, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5V 1L5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENISE A. LINDENAUER
DENISE A LINDENAUER AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |