USPTO serial 75586146
@COURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with @COURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chris Garber
CHRIS GARBER KLINEDINST PC501 W BROADWAY STE 600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic forms and publications in the nature of printed legal forms, court and administrative agency documents, directories and calendars, Rules of Court, statutes, ordinances and regulations, and information and articles about legal issues, courts, administrative agencies and procedures, all in the field of law and government administration; computer software for use in the electronic filing, indexing and electronic transmission of legal and federal, state and municipal court, administrative agency and government forms and documents; computer software for use in converting printed forms and documents to electronic forms and documents for use in the electronic filing of such forms and documents with federal, state and municipal courts, governments and administrative agencies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic payment services for payment of court fees, filing fees and other official fees and payment for government services rendered | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic document and information communications and telecommunications services, namely, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; electronic transmission of prepared legal, governmental and other official documents and information to and from federal, state and municipal courts, government offices and administrative agencies; electronic transfer of documents, information and data between federal, state and municipal courts, government and administrative agencies, attorneys and others using court services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Healy, John G.
- Other trademarks owned by Healy, John G.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named @COURT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |